Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The divided Germany

It has been more than thirty years since the German reunification but the recent European parliament election once again makes it very clear that there still exist two Germany when it comes to politics.

In nearly all of the geographical parts that once made up the east German state, the Alternative für Deutschland party now is the largest party in terms of votes. In fact, the only outliers from this pattern are Berlin, Potsdam city center and its surrounding land district, the district of Eichfeld which borders the “west Germany”, and the three Thuringian city centers of Erfurt, Weimar and Jena.

At the same time, there is not a single election district in the old west Germany where AfD is the party with the largest share of the vote. Here, that party is instead almost everywhere the Christian-democratic CDU – or in Bavaria its sister party CSU – with a few city center exceptions where the Greens or in some even fewer cases the Social Democratic Party comes out on top.

In addition, it is also worth noting that in the eastern parts a not insignificant number of voters chose to give their vote to the new Bündnis Sarah Wagenknecht, a break-away from the Left party, while the same BSW in the western part garnered much lower numbers.

It is clear that Germany has a deep political divide and that it even after three decades have something to do with its divided history. That so many voters – in many cases around half of the voting population – in the eastern part chooses to give their vote to parties either to the extreme right or the extreme left cannot be viewed as anything else than a deep dissatisfaction with the traditional parties and their policies. A dissatisfaction that in some way or another must be listened to and taken seriously in order to stop anti-democratic forces from harnessing the discontent for their own purposes.

Macron’s high gamble

President Emmanuel Macron’s decision to dissolve the French parliament and proscribe a national election as soon as the result of the election to the EU parliament was clear is a high stakes gamble.

One thing to remember is that the French national elections and the elections for the EU parliament in France follows two different electorial systems. The EU parliament election is a proportional vote while the French elections is a variant of majority vote. This do mean that the Rassemblement National’s result in the first is not necessarily directly corresponding to a potential result in a national election. And this is probably one of the calculations made by Macron. The two-round voting system means that in the second round there will be only a couple names to choose by in each single seat electorial district.

Traditionally, the Rassemblement national/Front National’s results in French elections to the National Assembly as well as presidential elections have been tempered by the electorate’s willingness to come together and vote for “anyone but FN”. This is pretty much how every French president from Jacques Chirac forward have got their job.

The big question looming over the coming election is if this “anyone but…” voting pattern will still hold. The RN’s success in the European election is a sign that many French voters are prepared to vote for them, maybe also in a national election, and already in the last election where RN got 88 seats in the National Assembly this cordon sanitaire showed signs of breaking.

The second part of Macron’s calculation may be that elections to the European parliament and elections to the French National Assembly are in people’s mind two different things. Traditionally in most countries there is a clear increased willingness among many voters to be somewhat more “daring” in their choice of candidates for the in their minds more abstract and less important European Parliament than for their respective national parliaments. So when forced to show their cards in “a real election” some may be slightly less inclined to pick the more unsafe card.

At least that must be what president Macron hopes for in his high stakes gamble.